Skip to content
Hannaji Puri

Case study · K–12 International School

Building an SAT Program from Zero

A curriculum that still runs without me — the needs analysis, the materials, and the train-the-trainer system behind the school's first in-house SAT prep program.

Role
Head of Research & Program Development · SAT Program Coordinator
Location
Taif, Saudi Arabia
Years
2015 – 2020
Scope
Grades 10 – 12

Skills: Program Design, Train-the-Trainer, Assessment

+200

avg score band lift

5 yrs

pioneering the program

10–12

grades reached

Still live

running after my exit

Overview

As Head of Research & Program Development at an American-accredited K–12 international school in Saudi Arabia, I designed the institution's first in-house SAT preparation program: the needs analysis, the curriculum, the materials, and the train-the-trainer system that let other instructors deliver it consistently, for Grades 10–12.

The challenge

Before the program, students who wanted a competitive SAT score had to find independent tutors on their own and travel to other cities to sit prep courses — preparation was inconsistent, expensive, and available only to families who could arrange it. As an American-system school accredited by AdvancED (now Cognia), the SAT was the natural standardized measure to bring in-house: a globally recognized pathway to universities abroad, without students leaving campus to prepare for it.

Objectives

  1. 01

    Bring SAT preparation in-house and make it equitable across the whole cohort.

  2. 02

    Design a repeatable curriculum and material set — not a one-off cram course.

  3. 03

    Enable any qualified instructor to deliver it consistently and to standard.

  4. 04

    Establish measurable score baselines and demonstrably lift them.

How it was built

Phase 01

Partnership & groundwork

Established the school as a College Board certification and training center, and attended College Board forums to stay current on SAT preparation practice and format updates. I translated those requirements into a working program blueprint the school could actually staff and run.

Phase 02

Curriculum & materials design

I authored original lessons, strategy decks, and practice sets, and curated vetted external resources into a single coherent sequence. Delivery ran on two tracks: skills embedded directly into English and Math from Grades 10–12, plus a dedicated SAT prep subject scheduled in the three months before each cohort's exam date.

Phase 03

Facilitator enablement (train-the-trainer)

I trained instructors on what the SAT is, how to review each test section, how to use the prep materials, and how to teach review and pacing strategies. Consistency was held through shadowing, classroom observation, and regular calibration meetings where coordinators and instructors aligned on materials and strategy.

From bolt-on prep to a vertically aligned curriculum

Rather than keep prep as an add-on, I worked it into the system. English and Math assessments were gradually redesigned to mirror PSAT and SAT item patterns, and the curriculum added activities that built critical reading, academic writing, and logical reasoning earlier.

The result: students reached their exam years already fluent in the skills the test measures. The clearest signal it worked — the program is still running at the school after my departure.

Materials and tools

What I made, and what I made it with.

AuthoredStrategy lecture decks — reading, writing & language, grammar
AuthoredPractice sets with annotated answer keys and worked explanations
AuthoredInstructor briefs and pacing guides for consistent delivery
CuratedVetted resource banks sequenced to each lesson
AlignedEnglish & Math assessments patterned on PSAT / SAT items
ToolsCollege Board resources, curated prep platforms, standard doc & slide tooling

Results and impact

Measurable lift, and doors opened internationally.

Cohort average moved up a full band once prep went in-house

Before · 800–1000 · unprepped
After · 1000–1200
400800100012001600

Graduates admitted to universities across United States, Armenia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Philippines, Australia, Malaysia.

How I'd evolve it today

Rebuilt for the Digital SAT and faster feedback

The program was built for the 2016 paper SAT. Today's SAT is digital, section-adaptive, and delivered in College Board's Bluebook app, with a combined Reading & Writing section and Desmos built into math — so a modern rebuild is where I would focus next.

I would rebuild practice around the adaptive digital format; replace static link banks (many now dead) with a maintained resource hub; convert print worksheets into interactive, auto-graded practice; add a cohort score dashboard for live tracking; and use AI tooling to generate differentiated practice items and give students faster, individualized feedback.

Capabilities demonstrated

  • Needs analysis
  • Curriculum design
  • Instructional design
  • Train-the-trainer
  • Facilitator enablement
  • Assessment alignment
  • Program management
  • Stakeholder partnership
  • Learning measurement

Training materials

SAT Reading & Writing teaching decks, an anonymized in-class practice test, and the instructor coordination memo.

Coming soon, on request

Program details anonymized · Taif, Saudi Arabia · 2015 – 2020

All case studies